Businesses in New York City seem to have a dilemma when it comes to the city’s mayoral pick. Following Andrew Cuomo’s announcement that he would stay in the race as an independent after losing to Zohran Mamdani, New York-based CEOs have yet to coalesce behind either the former governor or incumbent Eric Adams in their bid to defeat Mamdani, a Democratic socialist who won the primary in June.
“I can only vote for one candidate in November, and that decision won’t be made until closer to Election Day,” said Jared Epstein, president of real-estate owner and developer Aurora Capital Associates, in an email. “Until then, like nearly every one of the 20,000 contacts in my phone, my position is simple: ABZ – ‘Anyone But Zohran.'”
Mamdani’s political affiliations and outspoken support for Palestinian rights have stirred controversy within parts of the business community, including among Jewish leaders. These tensions have sometimes resulted in public disputes, further polarizing opinion about his candidacy. Consequently, many business leaders are rallying behind Mayor Eric Adams, viewing him as a more moderate and business-friendly candidate capable of maintaining economic stability. However, divisions remain, with some questioning whether Adams can effectively counter Mamdani’s growing support in the race.
RELATED: Zohran Mamdani’s victory represents a seismic shift in Democratic politics (June 25, 2025)
Reuters reports that business owners are concerned that Mamdani’s proposals, which include rent freezes, free city buses and city-owned grocery stores, would add to residents’ tax burden and cause an exodus of capital.
According to the city’s campaign finance board, Mamdani has raised about $820,000 since the primary through July 21. Adams has raised roughly $1.5 million since June 10.
Many remain cautious, hesitant to fully endorse either incumbent Mayor Eric Adams or Cuomo, reflecting broader uncertainty about the city’s political and economic future.
Mamdani’s progressive platform, including rent freezes, free public transportation, and city-owned grocery stores, has stirred concern among business owners who fear these policies could exacerbate tax burdens and drive away investment. His outspoken support for Palestinian rights has also ignited controversies, further polarizing opinions within the business community, especially among Jewish leaders. These factors have led many business leaders to coalesce around Mayor Adams, whom they perceive as a more moderate and pragmatic choice to maintain economic stability. Yet, divisions persist, with questions remaining about Adams’ ability to consolidate support and effectively challenge Mamdani’s growing appeal to voters seeking substantial change.
Financially, Mamdani’s fundraising lags behind Adams, suggesting that while his grassroots momentum is strong, he faces an uphill battle in securing the resources needed for a general election campaign. Ultimately, the mayoral race encapsulates a broader debate about New York City’s future direction, balancing progressive reforms with the concerns of business and economic sustainability. The coming months will be critical in determining whether the city opts for transformative change or continuity under more traditional leadership.
Moreover, the role of media and public discourse in shaping perceptions of the candidates cannot be underestimated. Coverage of Mamdani’s policies and personal background has often been polarized, influencing public opinion in ways that extend beyond policy details to questions of identity and ideology. Social media amplifies both support and criticism, creating an environment where misinformation and partisan narratives can flourish.