Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna came to the defense of popular children’s personality and content creator “Ms. Rachel” who has been mired in an antisemitic controversy recently.
In response to a post on X which listed Ms. Rachel as an antisemite contending for “antisemite of the year 2025,” Khanna said: “Ms. Rachel is a preschool teacher who speaks up for starving children in Gaza. That is not antisemitism. I hope thousands will join me in standing up for her.”
READ: Rep. Ro Khanna criticizes Trump’s decision to relocate AI hub to Dubai (May 19, 2025)
Ms. Rachel was featured among many other supposed antisemites like Tucker Carlson and Cynthia Nixon.
Ms. Rachel, whose full name is Rachel Griffin Accurso, is a U.S.-based early childhood educator, singer, and YouTube content creator. She is best known for her channel “Ms. Rachel” (originally “Songs for Littles”), which produces nursery rhymes and educational videos aimed at toddlers and preschoolers. Her content focuses on language development, early learning, and social-emotional skills, and has amassed billions of views.
Beyond children’s education, she has become increasingly involved in humanitarian issues, particularly highlighting the plight of children affected by conflicts such as in Gaza. Her activism includes fundraising for children in conflict zones and raising awareness about global humanitarian crises.
This activism, however, has drawn controversy. Certain pro-Israel groups, including StopAntisemitism, accused her of spreading “Hamas-aligned propaganda” through posts depicting the suffering of Palestinian children. Some of the claims, such as that the images she shared were misleading or debunked, are disputed and not independently verified.
The group also urged the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate whether she was receiving foreign funding for these activities, but no public evidence has confirmed that she has received foreign funds. Ms. Rachel strongly rejects these allegations, stating that her concern is purely humanitarian, emphasizing the importance of supporting all children in need, regardless of nationality or religion.
While Ms. Rachel is widely recognized for her educational content and dedication to early childhood development, her humanitarian advocacy, particularly for children affected by conflict in Gaza, has drawn intense scrutiny and polarized responses.
Supporters, including figures like Rep. Ro Khanna, emphasize that her actions stem from genuine concern for vulnerable children and do not reflect prejudice against any group. This situation underscores the challenges that public figures face when engaging in global issues: their reach can amplify positive impact, but it also invites misinterpretation, controversy, and allegations that may not be substantiated.
The Ms. Rachel controversy also highlights the influence and responsibilities of social media personalities in today’s digital landscape. Even creators who focus on non‑political topics, such as early childhood education, can find their platforms thrust into global debates when they address humanitarian crises or social issues. Their reach allows them to draw attention to under‑reported issues, mobilize audiences for fundraising, and promote awareness, but it also exposes them to scrutiny, criticism, and misinterpretation.
Public perception can shift rapidly, and content intended to inform or inspire empathy may be framed in political or ideological terms by observers with differing viewpoints.