President Donald Trump is tightening entry requirements for travelers from select countries. The administration has added seven nations—including five in Africa—to a list requiring certain passport holders to post bonds of up to $15,000 to apply for entry into the United States.
Five of the newly added countries are in Africa — Botswana, the Central African Republic, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Namibia — alongside Bhutan and Turkmenistan. The move brings the total number of affected countries to 13, the majority of which are African nations, and marks a further tightening of U.S. entry rules.
The policy is part of a visa bond pilot program aimed at supposedly reducing visa overstays. Under the program, U.S. consular officers may require applicants from designated countries to deposit between $5,000 and $15,000 at the time of their visa interview.
READ: New rules require US visa applicants in India to collect passports in person (
The bond is refundable if the applicant either receives a visa and leaves the U.S. on time, or if the visa application is denied. Importantly, paying the bond does not guarantee that a visa will be approved.
It’s the latest effort by the Trump administration to tighten requirements for entry to the U.S., including requiring citizens from all countries that require visas to sit for in-person interviews and disclose years of social media histories as well as detailed accounts of their and their families’ previous travel and living arrangements.
The U.S. visa bond program was introduced under the Trump administration in 2025 as part of broader efforts to reduce visa overstays. Visa overstays occur when foreign nationals enter the United States on a temporary visa — such as a tourist (B-2) or business (B-1) visa — and remain in the country after their visa expires.
Initially, the program applied to a small number of countries with higher overstay rates or perceived weak immigration controls.
READ: US falls off list of top 10 most powerful passports (
The expansion of the U.S. visa bond program reflects a broader trend toward stricter immigration and entry controls. Policies like these highlight the balance governments attempt to strike between maintaining security and facilitating international travel and exchange. While designed with the stated goal of ensuring compliance with visa terms, such measures inevitably raise questions about their broader social, economic, and diplomatic impacts. Stricter entry requirements can affect not only travelers but also businesses, students, and cultural exchanges, potentially influencing international perceptions of accessibility and fairness.
The introduction of financial and procedural hurdles, even if refundable or temporary, underscores the growing reliance on deterrence-based tools in immigration policy. These tools are often framed as solutions to overstays or security concerns, yet their effectiveness may be difficult to quantify and their consequences may disproportionately affect certain populations.
The use of such policies also illustrates how governments can leverage administrative discretion to influence migration patterns, shaping who can travel and under what conditions.