President Donald Trump is coming to the rescue of single-family homes. Trump said Wednesday that he intends to ban large institutional investors from buying additional single-family homes.
“I am immediately taking steps to ban large institutional investors from buying more single-family homes, and I will be calling on Congress to codify it. People live in homes, not corporations,” Trump wrote in a post on social media.
Large institutional investors such as Blackstone, JPMorgan Chase, and other banks and investment firms have increasingly snapped up family homes in recent years, eyeing rising returns on home prices.
In 2026, the U.S. housing market remains shaped by the aftereffects of high interest rates earlier in the decade. Mortgage rates have likely eased somewhat from their 2024–2025 peaks, improving affordability at the margin, though borrowing costs remain elevated by historical standards.
READ: US home sales rise to seven-month high amid economic headwinds (
Home sales activity has begun to recover gradually, constrained by lingering inventory shortages as many homeowners remain locked into low-rate mortgages. Home prices nationally have generally stabilized, with modest growth in some regions and flat or declining prices in others, reflecting local labor markets and supply conditions. Strong rental demand continues, supported by household formation and affordability challenges in the for-sale market.
Some housing experts and economists have panned the idea to ban large investors, contending that it would have little impact on overall housing stock and risk depressing investment in the market.
“This will not fix housing affordability. It may boost single-family purchases, but it will come at the cost of reducing single-family rentals,” said Jaret Seiberg, analyst at TD Cowen, in a note Wednesday.
READ: Home sellers lose confidence as the housing market cools (
Institutional investors continue to play a visible but often misunderstood role in U.S. housing. Large institutional owners account for a small share of total single-family homes nationally, though their presence is more concentrated in certain Sun Belt and fast-growing metro areas.
Investors remain active in single-family rentals and build-to-rent developments, responding to persistent rental demand. However, the future scale of institutional investor participation is uncertain, as policymakers debate restrictions on large investors’ purchases of single-family homes. The effectiveness and ultimate implementation of these policy proposals remain unclear, and their long-term impact on affordability is still contested among economists.
The housing market in 2026 appears to be in a period of adjustment, but its long-term trajectory depends on interest rates, economic conditions, and legislative outcomes that are still evolving. Most analysts agree that lasting affordability gains will likely require coordinated efforts to expand housing supply, alongside targeted policies that balance the needs of homeowners, renters, and investors alike with market outcomes likely varying widely across regions, shaped by local demographics, employment trends, and regulatory environments.