As soon as my Emirates flight descended through Dubai’s hazy December sky, I could see a city materialize that seemed to exist in a different timeline than the one I’d left behind. On the drive to the hotel from the airport, I was awestruck by the glass towers catching the afternoon sun. Dubai Metro’s sleek red line cuts through the landscape with surgical precision, the geometric perfection of planned communities seem like AI recreations, and construction cranes in Dubai are building tomorrow in fast motion.
I have spent over forty years in Philadelphia. I know every pothole on Broad Street, every SEPTA delay excuse, every neighborhood meeting where promises evaporate into bureaucratic vapor. We don’t have touchscreens offering instant translation in forty languages, digital customs processing that takes ninety seconds, automated metro system that arrives exactly when the digital board promises.
I will admit it. I have urban envy.
I am not envious about Dubai’s Burj, the world’s tallest building, or Dubai Mall’s indoor ski slope.
Good for them.
My envy is about watching a city that actually works. About infrastructure that anticipated problems instead of reacting to them decades too late. About leadership that measures success not in ribbon cuttings but in systems that make daily life measurably better for millions of people.
Dubai
Dubai jumped eight spots to rank fourth globally in the 2025 IMD Smart City Index. It is a “20-minute city” where residents can access essential services within a 20-minute walk or bike ride. Don’t take my word for it. Walk through the city and you will see this as lived reality and not marketing hype. The Dubai Metro, with its driverless trains running on one of the world’s fastest 5G networks, connects neighborhoods with clockwork reliability.
Philadelphia has talked about becoming a 15-minute city for at least 10 years now. So far, we’ve debated concepts, made promises, placed blame and consoled ourselves while watching other cities like Dubai and Shanghai execute and operationalize.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Postcard from Dubai (
In December 2025, Dubai Municipality launched Dubai Live, a cutting-edge platform using artificial intelligence, digital twin models, and predictive analytics to manage city operations in real-time. Over 90% of customer service interactions are now handled by AI assistants, and the city is becoming paperless by digitalizing over 1 billion paper transactions annually.
Cities like Dubai, Shanghai and Singapore are implementing smart maintenance systems that integrate industrial internet, artificial intelligence, big data and cloud computing to shift from reactive to proactive operations. They are not just building infrastructure, they are reimagining what infrastructure can be.This is what political will looks like when it’s actually deployed.
At the risk of this essay becoming a ginsu knife infomercial, there’s more. Dubai’s Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park is the world’s largest single-site solar park, aiming to provide 5,000 megawatts of clean energy by 2030. The city reduced equipment failure response times from 60 minutes to 20 minutes through smart maintenance systems.
In Philadelphia, projects like these are pie-in-the-sky future ideas or plans that fill dinner conversations at the Union League among our city elites. As for the regular public in Philadelphia, they are not even thinking about this future for themselves, let alone planning for it. In Dubai, these are operational systems changing how regular people live today.
Go visit Dubai’s Museum of the Future, that architectural marvel that looks like it teleported from 2075. The aspirational future displayed inside the Museum does not seem out of reach to the residents of Dubai because they already live in the future.
I serve, or have served, several arts institutions in Philadelphia, and am proud of our city’s celebrated and world famous arts and culture infrastructure. Objectively, Philadelphia is a top 10 arts and culture destination city in the world. We have world-class institutions, remarkable collections, and deep history. What we don’t have is a city government and business leadership treating the future as something to build rather than something to fear.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Are you prepared to live a longer and healthier life? (September 29, 2025)
Philadelphia
My city is not too far behind other globally relevant hubs. Philadelphia jumped 12 spots to rank 13th globally in the 2025 Global Startup Ecosystem Report, with an ecosystem valued at $76 billion and over $900 million in equity funding attracted in 2024-2025. Our world class and elite universities spin out breakthrough technologies. We’re a top-30 global and top-10 North American ecosystem for innovation measured through research and patent activity. Penn Medicine is a category of ONE in innovation, futuristic research and therapies. We also have Wharton, Penn Engineering, Temple, Drexel, Villanova and countless other elite universities and colleges. Many of our nation’s leading hospitals are located in Philadelphia. Our arts and culture institutions, like the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Barnes, the Philadelphia Orchestra, the Constitution Center, Penn Museum, PAFA, and on and on, are the envy of the world. Most recently, our Penn researchers won a Nobel Prize for modified mRNA technology that became COVID vaccines. The new leader of the Catholic church, Pope Leo XIV, is one of our own, a graduate from Villanova University. Our Philadelphia Eagles are the reigning Super Bowl champs, and the world will be visiting our city this year to celebrate America and democracy.
Then, why do I have urban envy?
Because our innovation exists in hermetically sealed environments, university labs, tech incubators, suburban corporate campuses, while the city infrastructure surrounding them crumbles. We are a tale of two cities, home to elite institutions like Penn Medicine and one of the poorest big cities in the country. Pennsylvania has an $8 billion shortfall of unmet roadway needs despite completion of nearly 3,800 improvement projects. SEPTA faced a $240 million budget gap threatening elimination of certain Regional Rail lines, and residents watched as a 21.5% fare increase was temporarily postponed only through emergency state funding.
We’re a city where gene therapy startups raise tens of millions while neighborhoods live in constant fear their homes will flood every time it rains, where Philadelphia identified approximately $59.5 million in short-term repairs needed to address serious or critical port infrastructure issues, where the very transit system connecting our innovation economy faces existential crisis.
This tale of two cities narrative has been our story for the last 60 years.
Here’s the source of our frustration: the innovation gap in Philadelphia isn’t about ideas or talent. We have plenty of ideas and talent. Our home grown talent can be found in cities across our great nation, creating and shaping the future in other cities. It’s about implementation. It’s about political systems that can’t translate vision into infrastructure, that fragment responsibility until accountability disappears, that mistake endless community input processes for actual progress.
Incompetent leadership
My dinner conversations in Philadelphia have become unbearable for my friends since my return from Dubai. I am either praising Dubai, talking about other cities like Shanghai and Singapore, or harping on the fact that cities don’t innovate, leaders do.
What makes these dinner conversations awkward is that many of my friends are leaders who recently served or are currently serving Philadelphia in different leadership capacities. My hands are dirty too, so my rants are both confessions and regrets; not just accusations. Regrets that the UAE appointed the world’s first minister for AI in 2017, while we debated how to stop the spread of AI. That Dubai’s leadership set measurable goals, paperless government, autonomous transportation, renewable energy targets, and then actually achieved them. That Singapore, consistently ranking in the Smart City Index top 10, operates with similar clarity of vision and execution.
Philadelphia’s leadership operates differently. Our leadership excels at process over outcomes, at announcing initiatives that fade into committees, at pilot programs that never scale or projects that are mismanaged. Here’s an example: the Philadelphia Water Department’s Green City, Clean Waters initiative has seen expenses balloon to at least $4.5 billion at its halfway mark, more than $2 billion over original estimates, with costs directly passed to residents through increased stormwater charges.
I still remember my apology tour after telling a reporter that our leaders are tapeworms, for suggesting our citizens must eat two meals: one for the tapeworm and the other for the body itself. It is not lost on me that this essay is suggesting that the tapeworm is eating both meals.
Consider the Philadelphia School District’s chronic inability to provide functioning heating and cooling systems in its buildings. Students routinely attend classes in sweltering heat or freezing cold because our leadership can’t manage basic building maintenance. Meanwhile, the district’s administrative bureaucracy continues to expand, adding layers of coordinators and consultants while teachers buy their own classroom supplies.
Or look at our permitting process, which routinely takes months longer than comparable cities, driving developers to other markets. A simple residential renovation permit that takes weeks in other cities can take six months in Philadelphia. Small businesses face Kafkaesque bureaucratic obstacles that seem designed to discourage entrepreneurship rather than facilitate it.
Various neighborhoods in Philadelphia seem trapped in a time warp. Like Cuba, these blocks haven’t changed in decades while Center City builds futuristic office buildings and luxury condos. Parts of North Philadelphia, Mantua, Olney, Kensington, Frankford have seen minimal investment or improvement over generations. The same boarded-up storefronts, the same crumbling infrastructure, the same lack of basic services that existed fifty years ago persist today. Meanwhile, Center City and surrounding neighborhoods are attracting billions in development. Our leadership has effectively created a city where your zip code determines whether you live in the 21st century or the 1970s.
The Philadelphia Parking Authority epitomizes governmental dysfunction. It operates as a patronage mill, employing politically connected individuals while providing notoriously poor service. Meters malfunction regularly, the app is not always reliable, and enforcement seems arbitrary and punitive rather than systematic. Cities worldwide have modernized parking with integrated smart systems; Philadelphia treats parking as a jobs program rather than a service.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Hero wanted: Paging Dr. Fajgenbaum (
The college graduates seeking jobs are limited to Industrial and Internet-era professions because futuristic industries are being built elsewhere. Penn Medicine continues to be a hermetically sealed exception, proving that our soil is indeed fertile, but the rest of our city is not being cultivated accordingly. Our graduates in computer science, finance, biotechnology, and engineering routinely leave for Boston, New York, San Francisco, or Austin because Philadelphia’s leadership hasn’t created the ecosystem to retain them. We train talent for other cities’ benefit.
The Philadelphia Housing Authority has accumulated a massive maintenance backlog while hundreds of families languish on waiting lists for safe, habitable housing. Buildings deteriorate for years before emergency repairs are made, often at costs far exceeding what preventive maintenance would have required. This isn’t resource scarcity, it’s management failure.
Our street cleaning program is a potential bright spot. Our Mayor, a charismatic optimist and a cheerleader, has prioritized cleanliness as one of her top priorities. She deserves credit for her efforts. But, even here, we are deploying yesterday’s strategies to address tomorrow’s challenges. Other smart cities deploy smart waste management systems with optimized routes and real-time monitoring. Philadelphia’s streets remain visibly dirtier than peer cities. The city spends millions on cleanup but can’t seem to implement systems that other cities mastered decades ago.
The opioid crisis response reveals similar patterns. While innovative cities have deployed integrated approaches combining public health, law enforcement, and social services using data-driven coordination, Philadelphia’s response, although much improved under the current administration, remains fragmented across agencies that don’t effectively communicate. Kensington has become internationally infamous, a symbol of urban failure that damages our city’s reputation and, more importantly, represents thousands of lives lost to bureaucratic inertia.
We are managing decline and dressing it up as progress. We are maintaining aging systems rather than reimagining them. We are fighting over the existing pie rather than growing it.
Manufactured distractions
I am both envious of other smart cities like Dubai and angry at mine. Here’s what angers me most: the tactical use of division to obscure failure. When cities can’t deliver basic services, when infrastructure crumbles, when transit systems collapse, the conversation shifts to anything but competence and execution.
Culture war distractions replace discussions about digital twins and smart grids. Arguments about symbols substitute for debates about systems.
Philadelphia has had one of the worst declines in economic mobility among major regions, according to research from Opportunity Insights at Harvard. That’s not a political opinion, it’s a measured outcome. The conversation in Philadelphia focuses everywhere except on this decline. Our leadership can’t articulate a compelling vision for how technology, infrastructure, and human potential can be integrated to reverse this trend. As a result, our citizens suffer while attention scatters to manufactured controversies.
Dubai’s success isn’t about avoiding hard conversations. They made infrastructure performance the central conversation. Dubai made digital intelligence mandatory in public schools starting at age four. That’s not a partisan issue. That’s recognizing that the 21st-century economy demands 21st-century skills, and building systems to deliver them.
Here’s the good news: Philadelphia has extraordinary assets. Our world-class universities, our breakthrough research, our $76 billion startup ecosystem, our leadership potential in life sciences, AI, and advanced manufacturing make us a contender. History books have dedicated long sections about Philadelphia’s leadership in civics, commerce and culture. Our original grid plan, designed by William Penn in 1683, actually embodied many 15-minute principles before automobiles, suburban sprawl and car-dependent infrastructure reshaped our urban fabric and undermined the advantages in most of our neighborhoods. Our city was designed for walkability centuries before Carlos Moreno proposed the concept of a 15-minute city in 2016 and Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo championed it in 2020. Our neighborhoods have genuine character and deep-rooted communities. Our universities and hospitals anchor an innovation economy that most cities would and should envy.
The bad news for Philadelphia is that these advantages are being squandered by leadership that can’t translate assets into outcomes. We watch other cities deploy modern innovations like digital twins, AI-driven urban planning, integrated smart mobility, green infrastructure at scale, citizen-centered governance, while Philadelphia debates whether to fix potholes or study pothole-fixing methodologies.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Binge watching ‘Mad Men,’ reflecting on life’s carousel (January 5, 2026)
2026 Resolutions
To be clear, I am not suggesting that Philadelphia should become Dubai or Shanghai or Singapore. We don’t have to be a copy of an original. We have always been an original. But it is now time to become the best version of Philadelphia, and that requires learning from what works globally rather than making excuses for what doesn’t work locally.
So, what should Philadelphia do?
Philadelphia must invest heavily in digital infrastructure that enables smart city operations. We must modernize SEPTA not with patches and emergency funding but with the systematic transformation cities like Shanghai and Dubai brought to their metro systems. We must prioritize green infrastructure not as an add-on but as integrated design. We must focus on pedestrian-oriented development that creates genuinely walkable 15-minute neighborhoods. We must invest in digital twin technology, virtual replicas of entire urban systems that allow planners to simulate scenarios and optimize decision-making before breaking ground. We need systems that integrate real-time monitoring with artificial intelligence to oversee everything from construction activities to vehicle movements across the city.
Cities like Dubai, Singapore and Barcelona have already pioneered similar approaches. They test the impact of zoning changes, predict traffic patterns, and forecast climate risks before spending a single dirham, euro, dollar, or yuan on physical infrastructure. Shanghai has a Digital Sandbox, an immersive mixed-reality installation built on digital twin concepts. Seoul’s mVoting system allows citizens to directly participate in policy-making through digital platforms. All of these cities ensure an engaged urban planning process that reflects community needs rather than just top-down directives.
For our part, Philadelphia launched Philadelphia2050: Planning Together initiative in May 2025, seeking community input through surveys and partnerships with neighborhood groups. I applaud this effort. But, our engagement remains largely analog, paper surveys, community meetings, and traditional feedback mechanisms. We lack the sophisticated digital platforms that Dubai and Shanghai use to gather real-time resident input and translate it immediately into policy adjustments.
One of 2025’s most exciting urban innovations was the application of augmented reality (AR) to urban planning. Closer to home, in Columbus, Ohio, the Central Ohio Transit Authority used AR technology to help officials and the public visualize their LinkUs transit plan, placing QR codes on existing bus shelters so residents could see future stations through their phones. Participants described experiencing “something magical about scanning a QR code, raising your phone, and seeing the future.” Voters approved the funding.
New technologies are transforming how cities engage residents in the planning process. Instead of studying architectural renderings or reading dense planning documents, people can now stand on their street corner and see, through their smartphones, exactly how a proposed development will look and feel.
Philadelphia has barely begun exploring AR in planning processes. We are decades behind in tech adoption compared to other smart cities. Given our aging population and digital divide, we’d need to invest in accessibility and education alongside the technology itself.
In short, Philadelphia is planning for tomorrow using yesterday’s tools. This needs to change.
That change will happen when our leaders measure success by outcomes rather than announcements, who prioritize competence over racial and social division, who understand cities compete globally whether or not our local leaders acknowledge that reality.
Last word
Returning from Dubai, I can’t stop thinking about the contrast. The innovations transforming urban life globally aren’t science fiction, they’re operational in cities led by people who decided to make them operational. The technology exists. The methodologies exist. The case studies exist. The funding mechanisms exist. What’s missing is the political will to deploy them at scale.
Philadelphia has everything it needs to join the vanguard of 21st-century urban innovation. What we lack is the courage to demand more from our leaders than managed decline and distraction. What we lack is the collective insistence that our city can and should compete with the world’s best, not just the region’s mediocre.
Philadelphia should not copy Dubai or Shanghai. We should learn from what works and adapt it to our context, our strengths, our needs.
Philadelphia doesn’t need an overhaul. We have the universities, the talent, the history, the bones of a great city. We just need to choose leaders capable of translating vision into infrastructure, who demand outcomes over excuses, who insist our city compete with the world’s best rather than accept a slow slide into managed irrelevance.
That’s the urban envy Dubai awakened in me: not jealousy of what they have, but frustration at what we’re capable of but refuse to build. Not desire for their solutions, but impatience with our excuses. Not their future, but ours, if only we’d choose it.