It looks like Apple has a lot to hide. The tech giant has asked an Indian court to stop the country’s antitrust watchdog from seeking its global financial records as part of an investigation into its app store policies, while it challenges the underlying law’s validity, court papers show.
Apple is embroiled in a high-stakes legal and regulatory battle in India after the Competition Commission of India (CCI) accused the company of abusing its dominant position in the country’s app ecosystem.
The dispute centers on Apple’s App Store policies, particularly rules that require developers to use Apple’s in-app payment system and pay commissions, which the CCI argues unfairly disadvantage competitors and restrict consumer choice.
The case follows a CCI investigation that concluded Apple exerts significant control over the iOS app market in India, limiting alternative app distribution methods and payment options.
READ: From India to America: Apple’s record $50 billion iPhone exports signal global strategy (
According to the regulator, these practices amount to an abuse of dominance under India’s competition law. The watchdog has warned that it will proceed with enforcement action, which could include substantial financial penalties.
Apple has strongly denied the allegations, arguing that it does not hold a dominant position in India due to competition from Android and other platforms. The company maintains that its App Store rules are designed to ensure user security, privacy, and a consistent experience, rather than to suppress competition.
Apple has also challenged aspects of the CCI’s process in Indian courts, including the regulator’s request for detailed global financial data and the application of penalty rules based on worldwide revenue.
The dispute is significant not only because of its potential financial impact on Apple, but also because it reflects India’s increasingly assertive stance on regulating big technology companies.
The outcome could shape how global digital platforms operate in one of the world’s fastest-growing smartphone markets and may influence similar antitrust actions elsewhere. As the case unfolds, it highlights the broader tension between national regulators seeking stricter oversight and multinational tech firms defending their business models.
The US tech giant has said it fears it could be fined up to $38 billion if the watchdog uses its global turnover calculation for penalties.
READ: Apple’s valuation nears $4 trillion, as shares surge with strong iPhone 17 demand (
The Apple–CCI situation reflects a broader shift in how governments are approaching regulation of global technology companies. Increasingly, authorities are willing to challenge dominant firms and enforce rules designed to protect competition, innovation, and consumer choice.
Cases like this highlight the complex balance between national regulatory power and multinational corporate interests, especially in fast-growing digital markets. They also illustrate how evolving laws and oversight frameworks can have broader implications, influencing corporate strategies and shaping industry norms beyond a single jurisdiction.
Moreover, these disputes underscore the importance of transparency, accountability, and adaptability for companies operating internationally, as regulators test the boundaries of enforcement.
Ultimately, such conflicts serve as a reminder that the digital economy is not just driven by technology and markets, but also by legal frameworks, public policy, and geopolitical considerations, which together may determine how innovation, competition, and corporate responsibility are managed worldwide.