The US House of Representatives seems to be united against US President Donald Trump’s tariffs. A narrowly divided U.S. House of Representatives rejected on Tuesday a bid by Republican leaders to block legislative challenges to President Donald Trump’s tariffs, a move that could allow Democrats to try to undo U.S. tariffs on Canada.
“I don’t like putting the important work of the House on pause, but Congress needs to be able to debate on tariffs,” said Representative Don Bacon, one of the Republicans who rejected the ban.
“Tariffs have been a ‘net negative’ for the economy and are a significant tax that American consumers, manufacturers, and farmers are paying,” the Nebraska lawmaker said on X.
Lawmakers voted 217-214 to derail the plan to bar tariff challenges through July 31, with three Republicans joining 214 Democrats in opposition, the prohibition was included in a measure intended to open debate on three unrelated bills.
READ: Canada to bolster car industry amidst US tariff pressure (
The measure’s defeat is a notable setback for House Speaker Mike Johnson, whose slim 218–214 Republican majority leaves almost no margin for intra-party defections. Johnson and other GOP leaders argued that blocking tariff challenges was necessary.
Moderate Republicans, including Reps. Don Bacon, Kevin Kiley, and Thomas Massie, broke ranks, saying tariffs have hurt the economy and should be debated by Congress.
With the restriction off the table, Democratic lawmakers are poised to force votes on resolutions aimed at overturning Trump’s tariffs, beginning with those targeting duties on Canadian goods.
The House action opens the door for Democrats to try to reclaim congressional authority over trade policy. However, even if such resolutions pass the House, they would face the Republican-controlled Senate.
The episode reflects deeper tensions within Congress over trade policy and the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches. While tariffs have long been used as a tool of economic and foreign policy, their implementation often sparks debate about economic consequences at home.
READ: Trump threatens to block US-Canada bridge, demands ‘fairness’ and ‘respect’ (
Lawmakers from both parties are increasingly sensitive to how trade measures affect businesses, supply chains, farmers, and consumers in their districts. As a result, tariff policy is no longer just a partisan talking point but a complex economic issue with real political implications.
The situation also underscores how narrow majorities in Congress can amplify the influence of a small number of lawmakers. When margins are tight, even a handful of defections can shift outcomes and reshape the legislative agenda. That dynamic may continue to play a significant role in upcoming debates, especially on high-stakes economic matters.
More broadly, the dispute signals an ongoing conversation about congressional oversight and authority. Trade powers are constitutionally shared, and moments like this revive questions about how much discretion a president should have in imposing broad economic measures without direct legislative approval.
Future votes, negotiations, and possible legal considerations could influence how the issue unfolds. What is clear, however, is that trade policy will remain a focal point of political debate, reflecting broader concerns about economic stability, global competitiveness, and the role of government in shaping market outcomes.