Bank of America has agreed to a $72.5 million settlement to resolve a lawsuit brought by women who accused the bank of enabling the late financier Jeffrey Epstein’s trafficking network. This adds to the mounting legal and financial fallout tied to his abuse scandal.
The lawsuit was initially brought by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe on behalf of other victims. It claimed that the bank processed and maintained accounts that facilitated financial flows connected to Jeffrey Epstein’s network, even as red flags emerged. According to the complaint, the bank overlooked patterns that should have triggered internal compliance reviews under anti-money laundering regulations.
READ: DOJ releases Epstein-linked documents alleging Trump sexually assaulted a woman (March 6, 2026)
The agreement, filed in a federal court in New York, seeks to settle claims from a group of Epstein accusers who alleged that Bank of America failed to act on clear warning signs linked to suspicious financial activity. The proposed deal is subject to approval by U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff.
The settlement is expected to cover women who say they were abused or trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein over more than a decade, including years after his earlier conviction in Florida. Legal representatives have indicated that dozens of victims could be eligible for compensation under the deal. The defending lawyers said the settlement offers a practical resolution for victims who have spent years pursuing accountability. They noted that prolonged litigation could have further delayed compensation, while the agreement provides a clearer path to financial relief for those affected.
One of the key allegations involved transactions tied to billionaire Leon Black, who reportedly paid Jeffrey Epstein about $170 million through accounts associated with the bank. Plaintiffs argued that such large and unusual transfers warranted closer scrutiny and intervention by the institution. Bank of America denied any wrongdoing as part of the settlement. In its response, the bank maintained that it did not knowingly facilitate trafficking or abuse. It described the settlement as a step toward resolving the matter and avoiding extended legal proceedings.
READ: Jeffrey Epstein investigation: House panel issues summons to Bill Gates, Kathryn Ruemmler (March 4, 2026)
The case forms part of a broader wave of lawsuits targeting major financial institutions that had ties to Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. His death did not end the legal battles, as victims have continued to pursue claims against organizations they believe played a role in enabling his activities. Other banks have already reached significant settlements in similar cases. JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay $290 million, while Deutsche Bank settled for $75 million over claims linked to Epstein’s accounts and transactions.
Earlier rulings in the Bank of America case allowed key claims to move forward, including arguments that the bank may have benefited financially from its association with Epstein or failed to meet compliance obligations. These developments increased pressure on the bank to settle before trial.
For many survivors, the case represents not just a financial resolution but part of a longer effort to hold powerful institutions accountable. While the settlement does not require the bank to admit liability, it adds to the growing record of legal actions that have forced scrutiny of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to operate for so long within the global financial system.