America once introduced itself to the world with an almost mythic glow. For those who first encountered it through magazines, movies, and the cadence of its English, it appeared as the republic of Washington and Jefferson, Lincoln and Kennedy — a nation that built the postwar order, rebuilt Europe and Japan, and helped lift China into the global economy. Its universities set standards, its culture shaped imaginations, and its diplomacy — however imperfect — projected a belief that global problems demanded global solutions. Even its contradictions, from Vietnam to its reflexive UN vetoes, were framed within a larger aspiration to lead with purpose.
That image has dimmed. The country that once held itself up as a steward of norms now finds itself defined by a figure who boasted he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue without consequence, who treated institutions as inconveniences, and who blurred the line between public office and private gain. Behaviors that once would have ended political careers — ethical violations, conflicts of interest, open contempt for law — now barely register. The world sees a nation wrestling not just with political division but with a deeper corrosion of civic restraint.
READ: Satish Jha | India’s technology illusion: Why capability, not rhetoric, determines power (February 7, 2026)
This shift did not happen overnight. It traces back to the unraveling of American exceptionalism—the belief that the United States possessed a unique moral mandate. After World War II, that belief had substance: the Marshall Plan, the creation of global institutions, and breakthroughs in technology and science. But the Vietnam War exposed the limits of power, and the economic transformations of the late 20th century hollowed out the middle class. Deregulation and globalization widened inequality: the Gini coefficient rose from 0.35 in 1979 to over 0.41 by 2016, the highest since the eve of the Great Depression. The top 1% captured the overwhelming share of post‑recession gains. Entire regions — industrial towns, rural counties — were left behind.
Resentment took root. Communities that once thrived on manufacturing and stable wages saw jobs vanish, populations shrink, and futures narrow. Studies show that support for populism surged in places with strong social ties but deep economic decline — communities that felt abandoned by a system that celebrated prosperity elsewhere. Inequality sharpened this divide, creating what economists describe as a society exposed to the “brute force of the market,” where opportunity feels rationed and dignity feels negotiable.
Then came 2008. Barack Obama’s election was a moment of profound symbolic power: the first Black president, elected amid economic crisis, promising unity and renewal. His policies expanded health coverage, stabilized the economy, and reopened diplomatic channels. Yet his presidency also exposed the country’s unresolved racial tensions. By 2016, most Americans believed race relations had worsened. Police violence, protests, and political rhetoric deepened the divide. The backlash was swift and visceral. Conspiracy theories questioning Obama’s citizenship were not fringe — they became political currency, tapping into anxieties about demographic change and cultural displacement.
READ: Satish Jha | The great Indian trade retreat: India’s lost leverage, claimed victory (February 5, 2026)
The Tea Party’s rise in 2010 transformed economic frustration into cultural grievance. Gridlock hardened. Polarization reached historic levels. By the time Donald Trump entered the political arena, the ground had been prepared: a nation fractured by inequality, distrustful of institutions, and primed for a message that fused resentment with nostalgia. His victory in 2016 was not an aberration but the culmination of long‑building pressures. He promised to “drain the swamp” while enacting policies that favored the wealthy. He spoke to working‑class anger while deepening the structural divides that fueled it.
Foreign policy mirrored this inward turn. Interventions in Iraq and Libya had already eroded global trust. The post‑Cold War belief in unipolar dominance had produced costly wars and few successes. “America First” accelerated the retreat: withdrawal from climate agreements, attacks on alliances, and a diplomacy defined by threats rather than cooperation. The January 6 attack on the Capitol revealed how far democratic norms had frayed. A nation that once lectured others on constitutional order found itself confronting its own vulnerabilities.
Was Obama’s election the catalyst for the backlash? In part. His presidency symbolized a forward leap that exposed how many Americans felt left behind — economically, culturally, demographically. But the deeper drivers were structural: decades of inequality, institutional fatigue, and a political system increasingly insulated from accountability. Democratic erosion did not begin with Trump; it preceded him through gerrymandering, voter suppression, and the steady concentration of executive power.
Yet decline is not destiny. The United States has reinvented itself before — after civil war, after depression, after social upheaval. Its resilience lies in its institutions, its civic culture, and its capacity for self‑correction. Restoring its moral authority requires confronting inequality with seriousness: progressive taxation, investment in education and health, and a renewed commitment to shared prosperity. It requires diplomacy grounded not in dominance but in cooperation. And it requires a narrative that binds rather than fractures — a recognition that a diverse nation cannot thrive on division.
Read more columns by Satish Jha
America’s pendulum has swung from idealism to backlash. The question now is whether it can swing back toward justice, opportunity, and democratic confidence. The world is watching, not out of schadenfreude but because the fate of the American experiment still shapes the global order. A house divided cannot stand — but a house that confronts its fractures can rebuild its foundations stronger than before.