President Donald Trump may be disappointed that the United States Constitution is preventing him from running for president a third time. Trump has said it is “pretty clear” the U.S. Constitution does not permit him to run for the third term in office, after days of speculation prompted by claims from allies there was a plan to let him do just that.
“I have my highest poll numbers that I’ve ever had,” he told reporters on board Air Force One as he flew to South Korea where he is attending the APEC Summit as part of a whirlwind tour of Asia.
“And, you know, based on what I read, I guess I’m not allowed to run so we’ll see what happens,” he said.
READ: DHS to end automatic extension policy for immigrant work permits (EADs) (
The restriction on U.S. presidents serving more than two terms comes from the Twenty-Second Amendment, ratified in 1951. This amendment was largely a response to Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was elected to four terms between 1932 and 1944, breaking the long-standing precedent set by George Washington of serving only two terms.
The amendment limits any person to being elected President no more than twice, and if someone serves more than two years of a term to which another person was elected, they can only be elected once more. This rule ensures a regular rotation of executive power, prevents the consolidation of political authority in a single individual, and safeguards democratic governance.
By formally codifying a two-term limit, the amendment reinforces the principle that the Presidency is a public trust, not a lifelong position, and helps maintain the balance of power among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the U.S. constitutional system.
House Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday told reporters he had spoken with Trump about the possibility of the president seeking a third term but he sees no path for it as any change to the U.S. Constitution would be well after Trump has left office.
“It’s been a great run. But I think the president knows, and he and I have talked about, the constrictions of the Constitution, as much as so many of the American people lament that,” Johnson said.
Speculation about potential workarounds highlights the tension between political ambition and institutional limits, but any change would require a lengthy and highly challenging constitutional process.