The traditional, promise-based financial systems (trusted intermediaries, legal enforcement, government guarantees) are undergoing an unprecedented transformational shift to code-based financial systems (cryptographic verification, algorithmic consensus, mathematical enforcement).
Why?
Because the traditional system, built on institutions saying “trust us,” systematically betrays that trust through debasement, failures, and mismanagement. The new system, built on code, allows you to “verify yourself” so that trust is unnecessary and the rules are transparent, immutable, and automatically enforced.
This historic transition will define economic winners and losers for decades to come. If you recognize this shift early and position accordingly, you will benefit enormously. If you cling to 20th century assumptions, that cash savings preserve value, that institutions reliably protect depositors, that traditional finance will remain dominant, you will face difficult adjustments.
But, what are the primary reasons for this transition?
The Review by Ajay Raju: Conspiracy thesis: Is the US strategically devaluing the dollar? (October 27, 2025)
There are four main reasons: unprecedented monetary expansion, technological displacement of labor, the maturation of blockchain infrastructure, and regulatory clarity and acceptance.
First, the $38 trillion US federal debt and $6.6 trillion Federal Reserve balance sheet make fiscal restraint politically impossible. Fiat currencies will continue systematic debasement, transferring wealth from savers to asset holders. This is not speculation. This is a mathematical inevitability given demographics, entitlement obligations, and political economy.
Second, AI and automation are rendering traditional human cognitive labor increasingly abundant and therefore less economically valuable. The 20th century social contract, stable employment providing middle-class income through wages alone, is breaking. Capital ownership is becoming increasingly essential for wealth preservation.
Third, cryptocurrency has evolved from speculative experiment to institutional infrastructure. The approval of Bitcoin ETFs, $300 billion in stablecoins processing $1.8-plus trillion monthly, and $237 billion in DeFi TVL demonstrate genuine economic utility, not merely speculation.
Lastly, the second Trump reign has ushered in a dramatic regulatory pivot. From the passing of the GENIUS Act to new proposals to create a Bitcoin reserve strategy, lawmakers are signaling a bipartisan acceptance of cryptocurrency as an important element of our national economic strategy. Most recently, Trump’s nomination of Michael Selig, SEC’s digital assets chief, to helm the CFTC will supercharge crypto oversight and innovation. Paired with Paul Atkins at the SEC, this duo screams deregulation green light, a bullish momentum for builders and traders who have been lobbying for faster approvals for crypto products.
The Review by Ajay Raju: The rising tide is lifting mainly yachts(October 20, 2025)
Old is Dying
The 20th century financial system served humanity well during periods of institutional trustworthiness and monetary stability, but those conditions no longer hold. Trust in institutions has eroded systematically. Only 39% of Americans trust banks (Gallup 2023), down from 53% in 2007. Government institutions fare worse. Congressional approval averages 18%, and confidence in the executive branch hovers around 38%. This erosion isn’t arbitrary; it reflects lived experience with institutional failures: the 2008 financial crisis, bank failures in 2023, persistent inflation despite promises of “transitory” price increases, and systematic wealth transfer through monetary policy.
Cryptocurrency is an architectural alternative. Trust through mathematics rather than institutions. Smart contracts that execute automatically rather than requiring courts. Transparent ledgers rather than opaque intermediaries. Decentralized consensus rather than concentrated control. This isn’t merely technical innovation—it represents a fundamental reimagining of how economic coordination can be organized.
When we compare and contrast the traditional financial system with the new world order for global finance, it is easy to see why this shift was inevitable.
Trust through Promises
First, every major component of modern finance rests on institutional promises. When you deposit money in a bank, you receive a promise of redemption on demand. This promise is theoretically protected by regulation, deposit insurance (FDIC in the US covers up to $250,000), and ultimately government intervention.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Last longer than 30 seconds (
Yet recent history demonstrates these protections’ fragility. In March 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, then the 16th largest US bank, collapsed in 48 hours, wiping out $42 billion in market value. Depositors with balances exceeding FDIC limits faced potential losses until emergency government intervention. That same month, Credit Suisse, an 167-year-old global systemically important bank, required emergency takeover by UBS, with AT1 bondholders losing $17 billion, subordinated to equity holders in violation of traditional capital structure hierarchy. In May 2023, First Republic Bank required seizure by regulators and sale to JPMorgan after losing $100 billion in deposits in weeks. These failures occurred not during a systemic crisis like 2008, but during a period of ostensible financial stability, revealing fundamental vulnerabilities in the system’s trust-based architecture.
Second, in traditional financial systems, ownership claims depend entirely on complex chains of custody, legal recognition, and enforcement mechanisms. A share of stock represents not direct ownership but a claim recognized by registrars, custodians, brokers, and ultimately courts. This system works efficiently—until it doesn’t. Settlement typically requires T+1 or T+2 days (improved from T+3 in 2024). Cross-border securities transactions involve multiple custodian banks, each introducing counterparty risk. Market hours are restricted (NYSE operates 9:30 AM-4:00 PM EST, closed weekends and 9 federal holidays). Access requires approved intermediaries, minimum account sizes, and geographic availability. Commercial agreements depend on legal systems for interpretation and enforcement.
But legal efficiency varies enormously. According to the World Bank’s 2024 Doing Business indicators, enforcing a contract takes an average of 590 days globally, ranging from 120 days in Singapore to over 1,400 days in Bangladesh. Legal costs for commercial disputes average 21.5% of claim value globally. Only 57% of the world’s adult population has access to functional legal systems for contract enforcement.
Perhaps most fundamentally, modern currency itself represents a government promise regarding purchasing power stability, a promise systematically broken through monetary expansion.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Underperforming American school systems must become AI-powered innovation hubs (October 6, 2025)
Trust Through Code
Cryptocurrency addresses many of the weaknesses of traditional finance. It is built on trust through mathematics, cryptography, and transparent code rather than institutions. Self-executing code eliminates the need for trusted enforcement intermediaries. For example, traditional derivative contracts require legal documentation (often 50-100+ pages), counterparty credit assessment, collateral management infrastructure, potential court enforcement if disputes arise, and settlement through trusted intermediaries. On the other hand, a decentralized finance (DeFi) derivative contract operates through transparent smart contract code that automatically executes based on oracle price feeds, requires no trust in counterparty creditworthiness (collateral is locked in the protocol), settles instantaneously when conditions are met, and cannot be selectively enforced. The code executes identically for all participants.
As of October 2024, DeFi protocols have processed over $14 trillion in total transaction volume since inception, with current total value locked of approximately $237 billion according to DeFiLlama, demonstrating substantial real-world usage of this alternative architecture.
Transparency and Accessibility
Blockchain’s public ledgers create unprecedented transparency. Every Bitcoin transaction since January 3, 2009 (the genesis block) remains publicly auditable, constituting over 1 billion transactions creating a permanent, immutable record. Ethereum has processed over 2.3 billion transactions across more than 250 million unique addresses. This transparency makes certain fraud types dramatically more difficult than in traditional systems where records are siloed, opaque, and controllable by trusted intermediaries.
Consider the striking contrast with traditional finance. The 2008 financial crisis was partially enabled by information opacity because of complex mortgage-backed securities with unclear underlying asset quality, off-balance-sheet vehicles, and synthetic exposures impossible for outsiders to trace. A blockchain-based system would have made such opacity structurally impossible. Rather than concentrating control in centralized institutions vulnerable to capture, failure, or censorship, cryptocurrency distributes control across thousands of independent validators. Bitcoin’s network operates across approximately 24,600 reachable nodes in over 100 countries as of October 2025. Ethereum has over 1.2 million active validators following its transition to proof-of-stake. No single entity (government, corporation, or coalition) can unilaterally censor transactions, reverse settlements, or shut down the network
The Review by Ajay Raju: Are you prepared to live a longer and healthier life? (September 29, 2025)
This decentralization has been tested adversarially. When China banned cryptocurrency mining in May 2021, eliminating approximately 50% of global Bitcoin hashrate, the network adapted within months. Hash rate has since recovered to 1,160 exahashes per second (EH/s) as of October 2025, setting all-time highs and demonstrating remarkable resilience.
Perhaps the most profound difference is accessibility. Traditional finance is fundamentally exclusionary. According to the World Bank’s 2021 Global Findex database, approximately 1.4 billion adults globally remain unbanked. Even in developed markets, banking services require credit checks, minimum balances, government identification, and geographic presence. Cross-border services are often unavailable or prohibitively expensive for average citizens.
Cryptocurrency enables participation requiring only Internet connectivity (increasingly available even in developing regions via mobile networks), a digital wallet (available free on any smartphone), and no credit checks, no minimum balances, no geographic restrictions. This represents potentially the most profound democratization of financial access in human history. A farmer in rural Kenya can hold and transfer Bitcoin with the same ease as a Wall Street banker—same access, same security, same global liquidity.
Efficient
Beyond trust architecture, cryptocurrency offers substantial cost and efficiency improvements over traditional financial infrastructure. Traditional cross-border payments involve labyrinthine infrastructure: correspondent banking relationships between institutions, foreign exchange services with bid-ask spreads, processors and intermediary banks, each extracting fees at every step.
According to the World Bank’s Remittance Prices Worldwide database, the global average cost of sending $200 internationally is 6.49% ($12.98). Regional variations are even more severe. Sub-Saharan Africa averages 8.16%, and South Asia averages 4.48%. Settlement typically requires 3-5 business days. Total fees commonly range from 5-15% of transfer value depending on corridors and services used.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Architects of mass political mobilization(September 22, 2025)
Meanwhile, crypto alternatives show dramatic improvement. Bitcoin transaction fees averaged $2.50 in late 2024 (regardless of transfer amount). Ethereum layer-2 solutions (Arbitrum, Optimism, Base) enable transfers for $0.10-0.50. Stablecoin transfers on efficient chains cost $0.01-0.10. Settlement to finality is approximately 60 minutes for Bitcoin and approximately 15 minutes for Ethereum. This represents a 10-100x improvement in both cost and speed.
The real-world impact is substantial. In 2024, global remittances totaled approximately $905 billion according to the World Bank. At an average cost of 6.5%, recipients lost $59 billion to intermediary fees. Cryptocurrency could return the majority of this value to the recipients who need it most.
Always-On
Traditional financial infrastructure operates on schedules designed for pre-digital commerce. Stock markets operate from 9:30 AM – 4:00 PM local time, Monday-Friday, and are closed on holidays. Branch hours for banks are typically 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM on weekdays. Wire transfers can be made on business days only. Foreign exchange is limited to weekend trading with reduced liquidity. This creates absurd inefficiencies. Prices can gap dramatically between Friday close and Monday open based on weekend news. Individuals who work standard hours have limited ability to manage finances during market hours. International coordination requires navigating multiple time zones and non-overlapping market hours.
Approximately 71% of hours in a year, traditional markets are closed. On the other hand, crypto markets never close. Trading, settlement, and access operate 24/7/365. There are no forced gaps in price discovery. Global coordination is simplified in that markets are always open everywhere simultaneously. There is also true accessibility for individuals regardless of work schedules.
As of October 2024, cryptocurrency exchanges report 24-hour Bitcoin trading volume, $96 billion daily, with trading activity relatively evenly distributed across all time zones. There were no significant liquidity degradation during traditional “off hours.”
Read more columns from The Review by Ajay Raju
Fractional Ownership
Traditional assets often require substantial minimum investments. Real estate, for example, typically requires thousands to millions of dollars per property. Alternative investments, assuming one is eligible, requires $100,000-plus minimums for private equity and hedge funds. Traditional stocks are technically divisible, but practical minimums exist there as well for certain stocks like Berkshire Hathaway Class A shares, which trade at $500,000-plus.
Tokenization enables infinitely divisible ownership. Fractionalized real estate tokens can represent ownership of $0.10 of a property. Tokenized securities can be divided to arbitrary precision. This enables portfolio diversification regardless of wealth level.
While tokenized real-world assets remain relatively early (estimated $35 billion in on-chain tokenized volume as of October 2025), the growth trajectory is clear. Major financial institutions including BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, and JPMorgan have launched tokenization initiatives, with Boston Consulting Group projecting the tokenized asset market could reach $16 trillion by 2030.
Automated Market Making
Traditional market making requires human intermediaries, with designated market makers on exchanges, bid-ask spreads compensating market makers for risk, and long-tail or low-volume assets often lack sufficient market maker interest, resulting in illiquidity.
Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) use algorithmic market making. Automated Market Makers (AMMs) use mathematical formulas (e.g., constant product formula: x × y = k) to enable trading. Anyone can provide liquidity by depositing asset pairs, earning fees. This enables economically viable markets for long-tail assets that would be infeasible in traditional finance.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Buy what everyone wants, what nobody can stop, and what few understand (September 1, 2025)
The results are substantial. Uniswap (largest DEX) has facilitated over $3 trillion in total trading volume since launch (May 2018). Current 30-day volume across all DEXs is approximately $418 billion, as of October 2025. Over 100,000 trading pairs are available, vastly more than traditional exchanges. Spreads are competitive with centralized exchanges for high-volume pairs.
Traditional finance involves layers of intermediaries, each extracting fees. Custodian banks hold securities, prime brokers provide leverage and services, clearinghouses settle trades, transfer agents manage ownership records, investment managers allocate capital.
Each layer adds costs. Consider a typical actively managed mutual fund. Management fees are 0.5-1.5% annually, administrative fees are 0.1-0.3% annually, trading costs are 0.1-0.5% annually, sales loads (for some funds) are 3-5% upfront, which can bring the cost to 4-7.5% in first year, 0.7-2.3% annually thereafter.
DeFi protocols eliminate many intermediaries. Smart contracts replace custodians because assets are held in user’s wallet. Automated protocols replace fund managers. Blockchain consensus replaces clearinghouses. Public ledgers replace transfer agents. The result is fee reductions of 50-90% for equivalent services. Lending protocols, like Aave, Compound, charge 0.05-0.5% versus traditional bank loan margins of 3-8%.
DEX trading fees are 0.05-0.3% versus traditional broker commissions of 0.1-1%-plus. Stablecoin transfers are $0.01-0.50 versus $15-45 for wire transfers. These aren’t marginal improvements—they represent order-of-magnitude efficiency gains that compound enormously over time.
Market Evidence
The crypto market’s evolution from retail-dominated speculation to institutional infrastructure represents perhaps the strongest evidence for its staying power. Before 2020, crypto adoption was primarily retail-driven, characterized by limited institutional participation, regulatory hostility or uncertainty, media narratives focused on speculation and illicit use, and few regulated investment vehicles.
READ: America first or left behind? US, under Trump, embraces economic isolation (
Between 2020 and 2024, we witnessed early institutional adoption, starting with Michael Saylor’s MicroStrategy, which began Bitcoin purchases in August 2020. Strategy now holds approximately 640,418 BTC, representing 3% of BTC’s total 21 million supply, valued at approximately $79 billion. Tesla disclosed 9,720 BTC purchase in early 2021 (partially sold since, but maintaining significant position). Block (formerly Square) maintains ongoing Bitcoin purchases as part of treasury strategy. Then in 2024, the major institutions jumped in. The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 represented a watershed moment. On January 10, 2024, the SEC approved 11 spot Bitcoin ETFs simultaneously. Within the first 10 months, these ETFs accumulated over $60 billion in assets under management.
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) became one of the most successful ETF launches in history, which has now surpassed 800,000 BTC in assets under management, valued at approximately $100 billion. Daily trading volume now regularly exceeds $2 billion.
By Q3 2024, over 1,000 institutional investors disclosed positions in Bitcoin ETFs in 13F filings. This institutional adoption extended beyond Bitcoin. In May 2024, Ethereum spot ETFs were approved, accumulating $7-plus billion in AUM by October. Now, Grayscale products (converted from trusts to ETFs) provide exposure to various cryptocurrencies, and traditional asset managers, including Fidelity, Invesco, VanEck, Franklin Templeton, have all launched crypto products.
Moreover, the sovereign and institutional allocations suggest the formation of a new financial order. In September 2021, El Salvador adopted Bitcoin as legal tender, accumulating approximately 5,800 BTC. Pension funds in several US states (Wisconsin, Houston firefighters) disclosed Bitcoin ETF allocations. University endowments, including Michigan, Harvard, Yale, allocated small percentages to crypto. Since then, sovereign wealth funds in Abu Dhabi, Singapore, and elsewhere have made crypto investments.
More importantly, there is now integration into the banking infrastructure. In October 2020, PayPal enabled Bitcoin purchases, now offering cryptocurrency services to 400-plus million users. Venmo added crypto trading capabilities. Cash App integrated Bitcoin functionality. Traditional banks including BNY Mellon, State Street, and Northern Trust launched crypto custody services. JPMorgan created JPM Coin for institutional settlement.
Perhaps the most telling indicator of cryptocurrency’s transition from speculation to infrastructure is the explosive growth of stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies pegged to fiat currencies (primarily the US dollar). Total stablecoin market capitalization now exceeds $314 billion. USDT (Tether) comprises approximately 58% of the stablecoin market with over $176 billion market cap while USDC (Circle) comprises 25% with over $74 billion market cap. Monthly stablecoin transaction volume now exceeds $1 trillion. To contextualize this scale, stablecoins now settle more value monthly than PayPal ($1.5 trillion quarterly), and is approaching the volume of Discover card network ($187 billion per quarter). USDT alone has become one of the most liquid dollar-denominated instruments globally.
Use Cases Driving Adoption
Stablecoins enable instant, low-cost international transfers, particularly valuable in corridors with expensive traditional options. Citizens in high-inflation economies (Argentina, Turkey, Nigeria) increasingly use dollar-stablecoins to preserve purchasing power when local currency access is restricted.
Stablecoins now serve as the base liquidity layer for decentralized finance, enabling lending, borrowing, and trading without volatility. Companies increasingly use stablecoins for international supplier payments and treasury management. In regions with unstable local currencies, stablecoins provide dollar access without traditional banking infrastructure. The stablecoin growth trajectory suggests cryptocurrency has evolved beyond speculative assets into functioning payment infrastructure serving genuine economic needs.
The Network Effects Moat
As cryptocurrency networks grow (more users, more liquidity, more infrastructure, more developers), they become increasingly entrenched. Each cycle’s bear market sees higher lows in both price and usage metrics, suggesting genuine network value creation rather than pure speculation.
With major financial institutions now offering cryptocurrency custody, trading, and investment products, and with their reputations now tied to cryptocurrency’s success, the coalition against cryptocurrency is substantially weakened. This isn’t retail speculation that institutions can ignore; major financial players are now committed stakeholders.
Institutional commitment increases irreversibility. With BlackRock, Fidelity, and major financial institutions now offering cryptocurrency products, their reputational capital is committed. These institutions will lobby for reasonable regulation rather than prohibition, fundamentally changing the political economy.
Younger generations’ preferences matter too. Millennials and Gen Z show substantially higher cryptocurrency adoption and ownership rates than older generations. As generational wealth transfer proceeds ($84 trillion will be transferred to younger generations over next 20 years), cryptocurrency allocation will increase automatically through demographic replacement.
And don’t forget that macroeconomic necessity persists. The $38 trillion federal debt is not going away. The $6.6 trillion Federal Reserve balance sheet will not shrink sustainably. Entitlement obligations are growing, not shrinking. The fundamental monetary conditions driving demand for alternatives to fiat currency will persist and intensify.
Last Word
Money, throughout human history, has flowed to whatever best serves monetary functions: medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value.
Gold dominated for millennia because it possessed the best combination of scarcity, durability, divisibility, and fungibility available. Paper currency replaced gold for transactions because it offered superior portability and divisibility, though it sacrificed scarcity (governments printed at will). Digital banking replaced physical currency because it offered superior convenience, though it sacrificed privacy and independence.
Each transition optimized for the dominant constraint of its era: Gold for societies where trust was scarce and transactions local; paper currency for societies where commerce expanded beyond local communities; digital banking for globalized economies requiring instant transactions.
The 21st century has many dominant constraints: monetary debasement as fiat currencies systematically lose purchasing power; institutional unreliability as trust in centralized institutions has eroded; global coordination as economic activity transcends national boundaries; digital nativity as younger generations prefer digital-native solutions; and surveillance concerns as financial privacy becomes increasingly rare.
Cryptocurrency optimizes for these constraints: scarcity (fixed supply); trustlessness (cryptographic verification); global accessibility (permissionless participation); digital nativity (blockchain-native); and privacy (pseudonymous transactions). In short, cryptocurrency is structurally aligned with 21st-century economic needs in ways that 20th-century financial infrastructure is not.
Capital is voting with its feet. The transition from promises to code is underway. Don’t be left behind.