When societal tension and catalytic moments intersect, mass political movements emerge that crystallize collective grievances into organized action. Throughout history and into 2025, two primary mechanisms have proven particularly potent in transforming dormant social discontent into dynamic political forces: pivotal moments of tragedy that expose systemic failures, and charismatic leaders who embody the aspirations and frustrations of their followers. These twin engines of political mobilization are once again fueling our current era of unprecedented global political disruption.
The tragic catalyst
Tragedy has long served as the spark that ignites political movements by making abstract grievances viscerally real and urgent. The effectiveness of tragedy as a mobilizing force lies in its ability to bypass rational debate and appeal directly to emotions. Grief, anger, and fear create psychological conditions conducive to collective action, while the dramatic nature of tragic events ensures widespread attention and discussion. The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk exemplifies how violent acts can instantly transform political landscapes.
Political violence is on the rise in America, with Kirk’s killing being the latest in a series of politically motivated violent acts that have created a moment of national reckoning. But we have been here before. The 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy accelerated the civil rights movement and reshaped American liberalism for a generation. More recently, the September 11, 2001 attacks fundamentally altered American foreign policy and domestic security apparatus, while the 2020 murder of George Floyd sparked the largest civil rights protests in U.S. history, mobilizing an estimated 26 million Americans.
These moments share common characteristics: they occur suddenly, generate intense emotional responses, receive widespread media coverage, and create a sense that the existing order has failed to protect fundamental values or lives. The tragedy serves as a focusing event that transforms diffuse dissatisfaction into specific demands for change. Immediately after his brutal assassination, President Trump eulogized Kirk as “a martyr for truth and freedom” making him a viral symbol of struggle and sacrifice.
The Review by Ajay Raju: Humanity’s meaning crisis (
The charismatic alternative
While tragedy can spark movements, charismatic leadership provides the sustained energy necessary to transform initial outrage into lasting political change.
Charismatic political leaders possess the ability to articulate collective grievances in compelling narratives that transcend traditional ideological boundaries. They function as symbolic representatives of broader social forces, embodying the hopes and frustrations of their followers while promising transformation of existing power structures. This populist approach involves a charismatic leader seeking to govern based on direct and unmediated connection with their followers.
The 2024 electoral cycle demonstrated this dynamic across multiple continents. Voters in more than 60 countries went to the polls in what turned out to be a difficult year for incumbents and traditional political parties. This global pattern of anti-establishment voting reflected widespread dissatisfaction with conventional political leadership and created opportunities for charismatic outsiders to mobilize previously disengaged populations.
Contemporary examples include figures like Javier Milei in Argentina, who combined libertarian economics with theatrical presentation to win the presidency, and the continued influence of movements built around charismatic leaders even after their departure from active politics. Perónists keep shrines to Juan Perón while Chávistas do the same for Hugo Chávez, demonstrating how charismatic movements continue to destabilize political systems long after the leader has left.
Tragedy + charisma
The most powerful political movements often emerge when tragic events coincide with charismatic leadership capable of channeling collective trauma into sustained political action. We observe this intersection in how charismatic leaders respond to and utilize tragic events. The September 2025 political violence in America has created conditions where charismatic figures can position themselves as either protectors of democracy or champions of revolutionary change, depending on their political orientation and strategic objectives.
Read more columns from The Review by Ajay Raju
The current trends in political stability and movement formation in 2025 are concerning. The most recent disruptions are not limited to any single region or ideology but represent a global phenomenon affecting established democracies and authoritarian systems alike. To understand the current context, consider the political cycle from 2020 to 2024, which was characterized by “election denialism,” with losing candidates or parties disputing outcomes in one in five elections. This pattern of contested legitimacy has created fertile ground for both tragic escalation and charismatic leadership, as traditional institutional mechanisms for resolving disputes lose credibility among significant portions of the population. Meanwhile, the frequency of politically motivated violence has increased substantially, with law enforcement agencies across multiple countries reporting rising threats against elected officials, journalists, and civic leaders. This escalation has created a feedback loop where tragic events become more likely while simultaneously creating opportunities for charismatic figures to position themselves as either victims or saviors.
Movement building
Social media has fundamentally transformed how both tragedy and charisma function in political movement formation. Tragic events now spread instantly across global networks, creating international solidarity movements within hours of initial incidents. The death of George Floyd sparked protests not only across the United States but in cities worldwide, demonstrating how local tragedies can become global catalysts. In fact, a charismatic politician can now respond to tragedy within minutes, frame events according to their preferred narrative and mobilize supporters before alternative interpretations gain traction. This speed advantage has become crucial in contemporary political competition.
More importantly, charismatic leaders no longer require traditional media gatekeepers to reach potential followers. Platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok enable direct communication between leaders and millions of followers, creating parasocial relationships that can be rapidly mobilized for political action. This disintermediation has lowered barriers to movement formation while also increasing the volatility and unpredictability of political mobilization. The algorithmic curation of content on these platforms creates echo chambers that amplify both tragic narratives and charismatic appeals, potentially radicalizing users and creating conditions for real-world political action.
Institutional responses and adaptation
Established political institutions have struggled to adapt to these new dynamics of movement formation. Traditional parties and governments, designed for slower-paced political competition, often find themselves unable to respond effectively to rapidly mobilizing movements built around tragedy or charisma. This institutional lag creates opportunities for insurgent movements while potentially destabilizing democratic governance.
READ: The DeepSeek moment: China’s economic threat (
The challenge for democratic institutions lies in maintaining legitimacy and effectiveness while competing with movements that can mobilize supporters through emotional appeals and simplified narratives. This competition has led to the populist moment currently affecting democracies worldwide, as established parties adopt charismatic leadership styles and dramatic rhetoric previously associated with insurgent movements.
New normal
Looking ahead, several trends suggest that both tragedy and charisma will remain central to political movement formation, but with evolving characteristics shaped by technological and social change. Artificial intelligence and deepfake technology may create new forms of synthetic tragedy, where fabricated events generate real political mobilization. Similarly, AI-generated content may enable the creation of charismatic personas that lack human limitations while maintaining emotional appeal to followers.
Climate change is likely to generate increasingly frequent tragic events that can serve as catalysts for political mobilization, from natural disasters to resource conflicts. These climate-related tragedies may prove particularly potent in movement formation because they combine immediate human suffering with clear causal narratives about systemic failure and elite responsibility.
The generational transition currently underway in many countries suggests that traditional forms of charismatic leadership may evolve to match changing communication preferences and cultural values. Younger political leaders increasingly combine traditional charismatic appeals with digital-native communication styles and progressive social values, potentially creating new hybrid forms of political mobilization.
International cooperation may become increasingly important in managing the cross-border effects of both tragedy and charismatic leadership. The global nature of digital communication means that tragic events and charismatic movements in one country can rapidly affect political stability elsewhere, requiring coordinated responses from established governments and international organizations.
Last word
The assassination of figures like Charlie Kirk demonstrates how quickly tragic events can reshape political landscapes, while the global rise of charismatic populist leaders shows the enduring power of personality-based politics in an age of institutional decline. The challenge for democratic societies lies in channeling the legitimate grievances that fuel these movements toward constructive political change while preventing the escalation of violence and the erosion of democratic norms. This will require both institutional innovation and cultural adaptation, as established systems learn to compete effectively with movements built around tragedy and charisma while maintaining their own legitimacy and effectiveness.