President Donald Trump has ordered the Pentagon to buy electricity generated by coal, his latest effort to boost demand for the fossil fuel amid its declining cost competitiveness and climate change concerns.
“You do so much,” Trump said at a White House event attended by coal industry executives and miners.
“You heat our homes, fuel our factories, and turn natural resources into American riches and dreams,” he said.
In an executive order signed on Wednesday, Trump directed the U.S. Department of Defence to enter into long-term purchase agreements with coal-fired plants and prioritise the “preservation and strategic utilisation” of “coal-based energy assets.”
“The most important people here today are those who get their hands a little bit dirty to keep America running at full speed – our front line coal workers,” Trump said.
READ: Pentagon clashes with Anthropic over military AI use safeguards (
This move is supposedly part of a broader effort to bolster domestic coal production amid declining cost competitiveness and mounting climate change concerns. The executive order calls for the Pentagon to enter into long-term power purchase agreements with coal-fired facilities, aiming to ensure “reliable baseload power” while simultaneously creating a guaranteed market for coal producers. Several coal plants in key states are expected to benefit from additional federal funding to modernize infrastructure and maintain operations.
Trump has championed the revival of “beautiful, clean coal” as crucial to boosting domestic manufacturing and achieving U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence, despite the fossil fuel’s flagging competitiveness and contribution to greenhouse gases that drive climate change.
Supporters of the initiative argue that coal provides a stable and dependable source of energy, particularly for critical federal operations, and that the federal government has a role in sustaining domestic energy industries. They also frame the policy as a strategic measure to reduce reliance on foreign energy sources.
READ: Pentagon to invest $1 billion in L3Harris’ rocket motor business (
Critics, however, contend that the directive prioritizes an outdated energy source at a time when renewable energy is increasingly cost-effective and widely available. Environmental organizations warn that expanding coal usage could undermine climate change mitigation efforts and might lock federal facilities into higher greenhouse gas emissions for decades. Economists also note that coal is less competitive than natural gas and renewable sources, suggesting that government subsidies may distort energy markets without providing long-term benefits. This policy illustrates the tension between energy security, economic interests, and environmental responsibility.
This development underscores the ongoing tension in U.S. energy policy between short-term economic and strategic considerations and long-term environmental and technological trends. Decisions that prioritize traditional fossil fuels reflect a desire to protect certain industries and maintain perceived energy reliability, but they also highlight the challenges of balancing economic, security, and environmental objectives in a rapidly changing energy landscape.