The House in Florida might be giving homestead owners a break. A proposal asking voters in November 2025 to eliminate most homestead property taxes cleared the House Thursday, while the Senate has yet to advance a similar measure.
“Although this (proposed constitutional amendment) stands as the House’s contribution to the property tax conversation, we continue to be open to any of the Senate’s ideas — provided those ideas ever materialize as actions,” House Speaker Daniel Perez, R-Miami, said at the opening of the floor session.
The Republican-controlled House voted 80-30 along party lines on a proposal (HJR 203) to put a measure on the 2026 general election ballot that would eliminate all non-school taxes for properties with a homestead exemption.
READ: ‘Leading the way’: Supporters cheer DeSantis’ crackdown on H-1B in Florida colleges (
“This bill does not guarantee that funds will keep pace with future needs,” said Rep. Robin Bartleman, a Weston Democrat. “What you’re doing is creating a floor and ceiling so that law enforcement, fire and corrections will never see a raise, never get new equipment, because there is no money to go around,” Bartleman added.
Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, said the proposal will shift property tax burdens to businesses and renters.
“I’m a firm believer in a balanced tax structure that is less regressive, that delivers need based relief,” Eskamani said. “The reality is that those who make the most money will get the biggest tax break. Those who make less will see less.”
The proposed changes to homestead property taxes in Florida highlight the ongoing challenge of balancing taxpayer relief with the funding of essential public services. How voters will respond to the ballot measure in November 2026 is uncertain, and the ultimate approval of the constitutional amendment is not guaranteed. If approved, the reduction in non-school property taxes could significantly alter local government revenue streams.
The proposal also raises questions about the distribution of tax burdens across different groups. Shifts in property taxes could result in higher costs for businesses, renters, and those without homestead exemptions, though the extent of this effect is speculative. How municipalities will adjust to potential revenue shortfalls, whether through budget cuts, increased fees, or other measures, is also uncertain.
The long-term consequences for state and local fiscal planning are difficult to predict. The interaction between this proposed amendment and future legislative actions or complementary policies could significantly influence outcomes, but these remain unknown. Public perception and political debates over fairness, economic impact, and equity could further shape how the measure affects governance and services.
The proposal illustrates the tension between immediate taxpayer relief and sustainable public funding. The broader implications for Florida’s fiscal stability, economic growth, and public service quality are contingent on voter approval, legislative follow-through, and administrative responses, making the real effects highly uncertain.
READ: DHS to end automatic extension policy for immigrant work permits (EADs) (
Policymakers may face increased pressure to balance competing priorities, and the responses of municipal governments, taxpayers, and the business community remain uncertain. How this measure influences future discussions on taxation, equity, and government funding could shape Florida’s policy landscape for years, though the precise effects are yet to be seen.
Public debates and reactions from various stakeholders—homeowners, renters, businesses, and advocacy groups—could influence how the policy is implemented and perceived. The measure may also set precedents for future tax-related ballot initiatives.