Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressman from California, is facing questions over Nvidia stock transactions disclosed by his household, drawing attention to his support for legislation restricting stock trading by members of Congress.
The controversy follows the disclosure of Nvidia share sales by Khanna’s wife around the time the semiconductor company’s stock reached record levels. The transactions have attracted renewed attention after allegations involving Nvidia co-founder and former CEO Jensen Huang triggered a corporate investigation and congressional scrutiny of the company’s national security exposure.
READ: Ro Khanna allies launch 2028 presidential campaign (November 8, 2026)
A report by PJ Media columnist Matt Margolis questioned whether Khanna had prior knowledge of developments surrounding Nvidia. However, the report did not present evidence that Khanna or his wife traded on confidential information.
Nvidia transactions draw attention
According to the financial disclosure information cited by PJ Media, Khanna’s wife sold Nvidia shares on Sept. 4 and Oct. 7, 2026. Each transaction was valued in the reported range of $1,000 to $15,000.
Nvidia reached an all-time high on Oct. 6, making the reported October transaction particularly notable. However, there is an important discrepancy in the available transaction records. Other congressional-trading databases list a September 4 sale by Khanna’s spouse and a Sept. 23 purchase by a dependent child, both disclosed on Oct. 7. The Oct. 7 disclosure date should not be confused with the date on which a transaction occurred. The second sale reported by PJ Media requires verification against the original congressional filing.
Khanna’s position on congressional stock trading
The controversy has also revived questions about Khanna’s position on stock trading by lawmakers. The California Democrat has advocated restrictions on individual stock ownership and trading by members of Congress, arguing that elected representatives should not be in a position where personal investments could create conflicts of interest.
Khanna represents California’s 17th Congressional District, which includes parts of Silicon Valley. He also serves on the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, a panel focused on the national security and economic challenges posed by China.
His committee membership has added another dimension to the controversy because Nvidia is a major supplier of advanced artificial intelligence chips at the center of U.S.-China technology competition.
Nvidia investigation adds to scrutiny
The stock transactions have drawn attention amid developments involving Jensen Huang and allegations of a foreign intelligence operation.
Nvidia’s board announced on November 8 that it had initiated an independent investigation following reports that Huang had been targeted by a foreign intelligence effort. The company said it had no reason to believe that U.S. national security or Nvidia’s confidential information had been compromised. The controversy involved Alice Huang, a former executive of Singapore-based Megaspeed, whom U.S. authorities reportedly investigated over suspected links to Chinese intelligence. The allegations have not been independently verified by Reuters.
READ: Jensen Huang’s affair sparks divorce questions: How much of his $150 billion fortune could his wife get? (November 10, 2026)
The Associated Press reported that Jensen Huang had resigned as Nvidia’s CEO, while longtime Chief Financial Officer Colette Kress was appointed interim CEO. The developments have prompted lawmakers to seek greater scrutiny of Nvidia’s dealings and potential national security implications.
No evidence establishes insider trading
Despite the questions surrounding the timing of the transactions, neither the PJ Media report nor the other cited coverage provides evidence that Khanna or his wife had advance knowledge of the allegations involving Nvidia. The reported transaction amounts are disclosure ranges rather than exact sale proceeds. Congressional financial disclosures also do not establish the reasons behind an investment decision.
The episode has nevertheless brought renewed attention to congressional stock-trading reform and the potential conflicts of interest involving lawmakers who participate in policymaking on industries in which their households hold investments.