The latest U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, followed by Tehran’s retaliation, have once again pushed the Middle East to the edge. Beyond the immediate military escalation, however, the real tremors may be felt in global energy markets.
Oil prices are notoriously sensitive to geopolitical shocks, and this flare-up is no exception. Even the perception of a wider regional conflict is enough to rattle traders. If the situation escalates further or begins to directly threaten supply routes such as the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil passes, crude prices could spike sharply.
Any disruption to production facilities or export infrastructure in the region would tighten supply at a time when markets are already grappling with fragile demand and output dynamics.
To understand why markets are on edge, it helps to examine Iran’s position in the global oil ecosystem.
READ: Oil and gold prices rise amid heightening US-Iran tensions (
Despite decades of U.S. sanctions, Iran remains a heavyweight in the energy world. As a member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, it continues to rank among the top oil-producing nations.
At its peak in 1974, Iran was pumping nearly six million barrels per day, trailing only the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Production has since fallen to about 3.1 million barrels per day, according to OPEC data, but that still makes it a significant player in a tightly balanced global market.
What makes the situation even more delicate is Iran’s reserves. The country holds the world’s third-largest proven oil reserves, giving it long-term strategic weight that far exceeds its current export numbers. Sanctions have curbed its ability to sell freely, yet Iran still exports an estimated 1.3 to 1.5 million barrels per day. A large majority of those shipments head to China, according to Ole Hansen, an oil analyst at financial markets firm Saxo Bank.
In the context of escalating U.S. and Israeli strikes and Tehran’s retaliation, this matters. Any disruption to Iran’s production, export terminals, or broader Gulf supply routes would not merely dent regional output. It could squeeze an already hypersensitive market, pushing crude prices higher and injecting fresh volatility into global equities.
READ: Trump welcomes $36 Billion Japanese investment in oil, gas and critical minerals (
If the conflict escalates to the point where Iran’s oil fields, export terminals, or refineries are directly targeted, the impact on global supply would be immediate. Removing even a portion of Iran’s output from the market would tighten availability overnight and send crude prices climbing.
But the bigger concern for energy markets extends beyond Iran’s production. It is the Strait of Hormuz.
Roughly 20 million barrels of oil pass through this narrow corridor every day, accounting for close to a fifth of global consumption, according to the US Energy Information Administration. That makes it one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world. At about 50 kilometers wide at its narrowest point and relatively shallow, the strait is inherently vulnerable to disruption.
Iran has previously threatened or targeted activity in these waters during periods of heightened tension. Even without a full blockade, the mere risk of confrontation can drive up tanker insurance premiums, slow shipping traffic, and create bottlenecks. Markets react to that risk almost instantly.
In practical terms, instability in the Strait of Hormuz would ripple far beyond the Gulf. Oil prices would likely spike, inflationary pressures could intensify, and equity markets could turn volatile as investors price in the possibility of supply shocks. In moments like this, geography becomes destiny, and a narrow stretch of water can influence the direction of global markets.
The risks are not confined to Iran alone. Its neighbors, particularly Gulf states that host US military bases, could also find themselves in the line of fire if the conflict widens.
Pierre Razoux of the Mediterranean Foundation for Strategic Studies told AFP that Iran has enough intermediate-range missiles to hit “vital points” across the region. Those potential targets are not limited to military installations. They include oil terminals, hydrocarbon hubs, power stations, and desalination plants. In a region that underpins a significant share of global energy exports, even a limited strike on such infrastructure would be enough to jolt markets.
The concern is amplified by the fact that oil markets are already operating with thin buffers. According to analysis from JPMorgan Chase, global spare capacity is limited. In a severe Middle East disruption scenario, prices could surge well past $100 per barrel.
The fallout would not stop at the pump. Higher crude prices translate directly into rising transport and logistics costs, which then push up food prices and manufacturing expenses. For economies already battling price pressures, that could mean a fresh bout of global inflation. Central banks would face a more complicated balancing act, weighing growth concerns against the need to contain price spikes.
In other words, what begins as a regional military escalation could quickly morph into a global economic shock, with oil once again at the center of the storm.