Americans need no further proof and firmly believe America is rising, and China is falling. On the other hand, global opinion is often the opposite: China is rising, and America is falling. In a personalized range of opinions, it makes no difference who is right or wrong; grassroots prosperity is a different matter altogether. Let’s go for a critical analysis. Let’s find positive answers.
The Grassroots Prosperity Test
1. China: The Grassroots Transformation: China’s transformation did not begin with hundreds of giant corporations. It began at the grassroots. The extraordinary story was the progressive release of productive initiative among ordinary people. Millions who had been primarily engaged in agriculture gradually became producers, entrepreneurs, manufacturers, traders, and exporters. The result was not merely more businesses. It was a massive expansion of productive participation.
2. The Unusual Beginning: In 1978, China had about 1.5 million township enterprises, employing roughly 28 million people. Within a decade, the number had approached 19 million enterprises, employing more than 95 million people. The unusual achievement was not simply the creation of enterprises. China learned how to multiply productive participation at extraordinary speed.
3. Value Creation at Scale: The transformation shifted millions of people from limited agricultural productivity into increasingly diversified production. Small workshops, village enterprises and local businesses began producing goods for increasingly larger markets. One enterprise could create value locally. Millions of enterprises could change the productive structure of an entire country. That distinction matters enormously.
4. Productivity Beyond Agriculture: China did not treat the movement of people from agriculture into industry as merely a job-creation exercise. It was a productivity transformation. People, skills, local resources, entrepreneurial initiative and markets began connecting in new combinations. The country’s productive capacity expanded because millions of participants were allowed to create, compete, learn, and replicate. Entrepreneurial thinking and freedom played a very big role.
5. Participation Became the Engine: The scale of participation became an economic force in itself. Instead of depending exclusively on a relatively small number of large enterprises, China progressively created an ecosystem in which millions of smaller productive units could participate. The lesson is simple: When participation becomes massive, participation itself becomes infrastructure.
6. Growth Through Replication: China’s remarkable advantage was not that every enterprise succeeded. It was that successful models could be replicated. A productive idea appearing in one locality could spread to another. A manufacturing capability could generate suppliers. Suppliers could create clusters. Clusters could create exporters. Growth became increasingly cumulative.
7. From Local Producers to Exporters: What began as grassroots production eventually connected with national and international markets. Local enterprises became part of supply chains. Manufacturing capabilities expanded. Industrial clusters developed. Export capacity grew. The progression was extraordinary: Local production → regional markets → national production → industrial clusters → global markets. This was not simply enterprise development. It was productive multiplication.
Read more by Naseem Javed: AI: Oh! Technocalamity, what will the world do with you (October 1, 2026)
8. Millions Became an Industrial Force: By the late 1990s, township and village enterprises employed more than 125 million people and had become a major component of China’s productive economy. The important number was not the size of any single enterprise. It was the accumulated force of millions of enterprises and hundreds of millions of productive participants. One small enterprise looks insignificant. One million small enterprises do not.
9. The Future Was Built From Below: China’s transformation demonstrates an unusual proposition: A nation does not necessarily become productive by first creating enormous enterprises and then distributing opportunity downward. It can also become productive by allowing entrepreneurial capacity to rise from below. Local experimentation, competition, replication and market access created a continuous process of productive expansion.
10. The Unusual Lesson: China’s historical experience should therefore not be reduced to a political argument about China versus America. The deeper question is: What happens when entrepreneurial participation becomes massive? That question belongs to every country. And today, technology makes it even more important.
What Did the American and Western Mindset Missed?
1. They Saw Factories; China Saw People: The West often viewed industrial transformation primarily through factories, corporations, capital, and technology. China increasingly discovered another asset: Millions of people capable of becoming productive participants. The distinction is profound. A factory can employ thousands. An entrepreneurial ecosystem can mobilize millions.
2. The West Measured Jobs; China Multiplied Producers: The conventional conversation frequently asks how many jobs an investment will create. A more powerful question is: How many productive people can become producers? That changes the entire equation. A job is one employment relationship. An entrepreneur can create products, services, markets, suppliers, customers, additional employment, and much more.
3. The West Managed SMEs; China Multiplied Them: Much of the Western SME ecosystem became institutionalized around representation, training, financing, consultation, conferences, and programs. Useful activities—but usually measured in hundreds or thousands. China demonstrated something different: The multiplication of productive units. The question was not merely how to help an SME. It was how productive enterprise could multiply across society.
4. The West Saw Small; China Saw Scale: A small enterprise is small. But the SME sector is not small. Five thousand SMEs are no longer a collection of individual businesses. One hundred thousand SMEs are a productive force. One million SMEs can become national entrepreneurial infrastructure. The mathematics changes completely when the unit of thinking changes.
5. Growth Became a Replication Problem: The conventional approach asks: How do we make this enterprise better? The scale question asks: How do we make what works repeat 10,000 times? That is a fundamentally different challenge. It moves the discussion from individual assistance to systems of replication, market access, expertise, technology, and entrepreneurial mobilization.
6. From Survival to Prosperity: Grassroots enterprise should not be viewed merely as a mechanism for helping people survive. At sufficient scale, it becomes a mechanism for creating prosperity. The objective changes from supporting vulnerable businesses to activating productive capacity. That is a much larger proposition.
7. Speed Became an Economic Asset: China’s experience also demonstrated that scale and speed can reinforce each other. When successful models are replicated rapidly across regions, productivity gains accumulate. The question is therefore not only: How many enterprises can be reached? It is: How quickly can productive capacity be multiplied?
8. Entrepreneurs Became Infrastructure: At sufficient scale, entrepreneurs themselves become part of national infrastructure. They produce. They employ. They innovate. They create supply chains. They open markets. They respond to demand. They experiment where bureaucracy cannot. This is why entrepreneurial capacity cannot be treated as a peripheral social category. It is productive infrastructure.
9. Scale Changes the Mathematics: Twenty enterprises can be trained. Five thousand can be organized. One hundred thousand can become a productive force. One million can alter the productive structure of a nation. The difference is not merely numerical. The unit of thinking has changed. And once the unit changes, the strategy must change with it.
10. The Question the West Rarely Asked: The West possessed the concept of SMEs but largely missed the mathematics of SME Oceans. It asked how to support small businesses. It built institutions to represent them. It created programs to train them. But the much larger question remained largely unexplored: How do you mobilize hundreds of thousands or millions of entrepreneurial enterprises as a productive national force? That is the question China’s history makes impossible to ignore.
How do we mobilize entrepreneurial capacity at scale?
That is where SME policy stops being a program and becomes a national mobilization proposition. It is also where the distinction between representing SMEs and mobilizing SME Oceans becomes unavoidable. The future question is not whether America is rising and China is falling. Nor is it whether China is rising and America is falling. The larger question is whether any nation can afford to leave millions of potential entrepreneurs, producers and value creators operating as disconnected islands when technology now makes mass entrepreneurial mobilization possible.
Twenty SMEs is a program.
5,000 is mobilization.
100,000 is a productive force.
1,000,000 is a national entrepreneurial infrastructure.
That may be the real grassroots prosperity test.
National Carpeting of grassroots Prosperity
One: Global Invitation To National Leadership
1. Identify the entrepreneurial population: Map the national SME population by sector, geography, capability, ownership, export potential, and growth readiness. Stop treating millions of enterprises as statistics; identify the productive capacity already operating.
Read more by Naseem Javed: AI: The Unanswered Questions (September 29, 2026)
2. Classify high-potential SMEs: Separate survival enterprises from scalable enterprises, exporters, manufacturers, technology users, emerging entrepreneurs, and hidden champions. Build a continuously updated national entrepreneurial map capable of identifying where multiplication can begin.
3. Activate productive capacity: Select thousands of high-potential enterprises and give them practical access to AI, skills, markets, finance, technology, procurement and export opportunities. Move from SME support toward measurable entrepreneurial activation.
4. Accelerate national deployment: Connect activated enterprises into larger productive networks, regional supply chains, export corridors and technology ecosystems. Use AI to accelerate decisions, capability building, market intelligence and continuous performance improvement across thousands of firms.
5. Measure grassroots prosperity: Track enterprises activated, productivity gained, exports expanded, markets opened, investment generated, jobs created, and entrepreneurs upgraded. Make national entrepreneurial capacity visible enough to manage continuously—not once a year.
Two: Invitation To Local Titans
1.Establish regional NAME Hubs: Experienced entrepreneurs, industrialists, and business institutions can become trusted regional centers capable of understanding local enterprise populations and guiding mobilization across 10,000, 50,000, or 100,000 SMEs.
2.Bring tacit experience to the table: Recruit proven business builders who understand markets, risk, production, customers, people, and failure firsthand. Combine their tacit entrepreneurial command with AI and explicit knowledge.
3. Connect fragmented enterprises: Link SMEs with suppliers, customers, technology, skills, financing, export opportunities and larger markets. Turn geographic proximity and entrepreneurial experience into productive networks without destroying enterprise independence.
4. Build regional productive engines: Identify clusters capable of rapid multiplication—manufacturing, agriculture, services, technology, exports and emerging industries. Give entrepreneurs a practical platform for moving from isolated activity toward regional economic scale.
5. Report results, not meetings: A NAME Hub should ultimately be judged by enterprises activated, capability upgraded, markets reached, exports generated and productive value created—not by conferences conducted, memberships collected or brochures distributed.
Three: Invitation To Global Trade Groups
1. Open the international door: Trade associations and business groups can bring entrepreneurial mobilization into global forums, moving the discussion beyond conventional SME representation toward practical international cooperation and measurable productive outcomes.
2. Connect national entrepreneurial populations: Build cross-border networks linking SMEs with buyers, suppliers, investors, technology providers, entrepreneurs, and institutional partners. Give thousands of enterprises access to opportunities normally reserved for much larger organizations.
3. Create global pillars of prosperity: Establish regional and national pillars connecting entrepreneurial populations across borders. The objective is not another association; it is a functioning network capable of moving productive capability between markets.
4. Turn conferences into execution platforms: Replace the traditional conference cycle—speech, panel, photograph, departure—with working alliances that identify enterprises, match capabilities, open markets, deploy AI, and continue operating after the event ends.
5. Build measurable global value: Measure cross-border enterprises connected, contracts generated, exports created, technologies deployed, skills transferred and markets opened. Make international cooperation visible through transactions and productive results, not declarations.
Wanted for Global Expansion: Searching for Special Skilled Entrepreneurs
National Mobilization of Entrepreneurialism is looking for people with exceptional skills and talents in free economies. In order to manage, hence, Expothon Worldwide program is looking for people who have actually built at an extraordinary scale. It seeks individuals who have built and delivered successful billion-dollar-scale national or global projects and are now ready to deploy that rare experience at a new scale of National Mobilization of Entrepreneurialism. The following are very selective criteria for individuals whose experience may be large enough to examine something that has barely been attempted:
AI + SMEs + TACIT + NAME = Grassroots Prosperity.
One: The five special skills being sought in each person
Proven entrepreneurial mastery — has already built multiple large-scale, billion-dollar-range enterprises with a global vision.
Large-scale success — has demonstrated multiplication: people, capital, markets, production, distribution, and global reach.
Tacit-command capability — understands what cannot be explained or written, like riding a bike or an entrepreneurial journey, while having an equally strong grasp of what can be explained through explicit knowledge, such as accounting, chemistry, technology, data, and institutions.
Unusual/out-of-the-box thinking — can dream, invent, and grasp entrepreneurial goals while understanding science, technology, AI, data, and explicit knowledge.
Systems-level imagination — can connect AI + SME + NAME + Entrepreneurialism and see a national-scale architecture rather than another project. The person should be comfortable with the distinct ability to see the architecture before it exists.
Two: Five direct benefits to the person
A new scale of challenge — moving from building one successful enterprise to examining how an entire national entrepreneurial population could potentially be mobilized.
A new application for accumulated tacit knowledge — decades of entrepreneurial experience can become relevant to a much larger human system.
A new category of legacy — instead of leaving behind only companies or capital, helping establish a national entrepreneurial capability.
Access to an extraordinary entrepreneurial ocean — 100K–1M SMEs create an unprecedented environment for ideas, markets, manufacturing, exports, technology, and cross-fertilization.
A front-row position in an emerging AI transition — examining what happens when AI’s explicit capability meets millions of entrepreneurs’ tacit capability.
Three: Five potential benefits for the participating nation
Entrepreneurial population becomes national productive infrastructure. Instead of treating SMEs as thousands of disconnected businesses, the country gains a mechanism for mobilizing them collectively.
100K → 1M becomes a measurable national capability. The proposition gives leadership a concrete scale to test, measure, and expand entrepreneurial mobilization.
AI gains a genuine deployment population. Rather than AI remaining concentrated around institutions and large corporations, it reaches an enormous existing enterprise base.
National entrepreneurial intelligence becomes connected. Manufacturing, design, logistics, exporters, educators, investors, and experienced entrepreneurs can interact across the same architecture.
The country can develop a new productive powerhouse without creating one giant corporation. The powerhouse is distributed across thousands or millions of independent enterprises while coordinated through a mobilization architecture.
Four: Five potential benefits for the nation’s citizens
More citizens can encounter entrepreneurship as a real pathway. The national conversation shifts from employment to value creation and enterprise creation.
Existing entrepreneurs can become more capable. The focus is not simply creating more SMEs but improving the capability of those already operating.
Read more by Naseem Javed: BRICS 2026: Economy will sacrifice elections (September 15, 2026)
Youth and women can enter an active entrepreneurial ecosystem. They become participants in a national capability movement rather than merely recipients of programs.
Local entrepreneurial knowledge gains national reach. A successful idea, design, manufacturing method, or market opportunity can travel across regions and sectors.
Grassroots prosperity becomes tangible. The ultimate measure is not the size of the program but whether hundreds of thousands of people and enterprises become more productive, more capable, and more connected to markets.
Five: Five distinct global achievements of Expothon
Shake the old system: Over decades, developed national mobilization of entreprenurialism protocols, challenged the established economic mindset from outside its institutions, and questioned why Entrepreneurialism was never treated as a natural global force.
Expose what it cannot see: Expothon lexicon identified the Tacit + Explicit + Mindset Divide—the enormous entrepreneurial knowledge and instinct that conventional data, institutions, and economic systems cannot adequately capture.
Take the challenge to the Cabinets: For the last 50–100 weeks, Expothon has communicated its unconventional propositions directly to approximately 2,000 Cabinet-level contacts across 100 countries, taking the challenge far beyond academic discussion.
Build NAME: National Mobilization of Entrepreneurialism emerged as the architecture for connecting AI + SME + entrepreneurialism, potentially mobilizing 100K → 1M enterprises as a national productive force.
Keep marching in search of the unknown light: After 50 years of ideas, global execution, hundreds of articles, keynotes, institutional challenges, and sustained progress to established thinking, Expothon continues forward—now searching for the rare entrepreneurial minds capable of seeing what comes next. Contact: Response deadline: November 15, 2026. nj@expothon.com Open to all qualified individuals from all countries who meet the criteria. Suggested reading: ask AI for Expothon Lexicon, on Mindset divides, Tacit-Explicit divides and NAME. Each response will be acknowledged.