President Donald Trump appears eager to strike a trade deal with India. On Tuesday, he said he “will have a trade deal with India soon” and that he has “great respect for Prime Minister Modi,” as both nations move closer to finalizing the framework for a new agreement.
The United States and India are preparing a landmark bilateral trade agreement, with the first phase expected by November 2025. Both countries aim to increase bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030, reflecting a strategic push to strengthen economic and geopolitical ties.
READ: Navarro’s hard line on India contrasts Trump’s praise of Modi (
As part of the deal, India is expected to reduce tariffs on over half of U.S. imports worth around $23 billion, while the U.S. seeks greater access for industrial and agricultural goods.
Speaking at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) CEOs Luncheon in Gyeongju, South Korea, Trump praised Modi, calling him “the nicest looking guy,” “a father,” “a killer,” and “tough as hell.”
The agreement is significant for both sides. For the U.S., it provides opportunities to reduce its trade deficit with India and expand exports in sectors such as technology, agriculture, and automobiles. For India, it opens access to the U.S. market, bolsters exports in textiles, apparel, and leather, and enhances its role in global supply chains.
READ: ‘Modi is a great man,’ Donald Trump says, claiming India will stop buying Russian oil (
Trump reiterated his intention to strengthen economic ties with India, saying, “I am going to do a trade deal with India,” while lauding Modi’s leadership and India’s growing global clout.
Challenges remain, including balancing tariff reductions with protections for sensitive domestic industries, managing political and regulatory hurdles, and addressing non-tariff barriers. Geopolitical considerations, such as supply chain security and strategic alignment, also play a role.
If successfully implemented, the deal could reshape trade flows, strengthen U.S.–India strategic relations, and create new opportunities for businesses on both sides, while highlighting the delicate balance of domestic economic interests with international trade ambitions.